• @Pogbom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        Addressing any of the points being made to you would be a great start. The first comment that you called shallow was a pretty good summary of why people support strict gun control, even if it was said sarcastically.

        • Melllvar
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Their point is that there are accidental and intentional, even mass, shootings. I don’t dispute this. I’m not even against reasonable gun control laws.

          But this was supposed to be a discussion about understanding an American perspective. Not sarcastically deriding any attempt to do so.

          • @Pogbom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            So then it wasn’t shallow and dismissive at all, you just didn’t appreciate the delivery. The points they made were perfectly valid and, ironically, calling them shallow and dismissing was itself shallow and dismissive. It just seems more like you used a bad analogy but can’t take the criticism.

                • Melllvar
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -21 year ago

                  What is something that makes no sense to Europeans?

                  That whole gun thing

                  It’s analogous to modern encryption law controversies //<–me

                  If you want to understand why it’s so hard to pass strong gun laws in the USA, then reasoning by analogy to the contemporary issue of strong crypto may prove helpful.