• @OldFartPhil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    In my opinion, microblogging isn’t really a conversational platform. It’s a creator and audience platform. That format has its place, as well, but Twitter/Threads/Mastodon/etc. isn’t a replacement for forums.

    • @alamani@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think that’s fair. Good conversations can and do happen, especially on platforms allowing longer contributions like tumblr, but when a site revolves around following people instead of subjects it makes your interactions a public performance to all of your followers. That has a huge impact on discussion quality, incentivising dramatic takes popular in your corner of the internet and disincentivising saying anything controversial.

      When you combine that with poor moderation on most platforms and algorithms that promote outrage-inducing content, toxicity and cancel culture are inevitable imo. It’s shit even for creators.

        • @alamani@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Ty!

          Thinking on it more, I think parasocial relationships should be mentioned too. If you get popular it can be difficult to publically argue with anyone without followers harassing them to defend you (and their followers doing it to you). If they do so publically, or just share what you’ve said, it can spread the argument to even more hostile people.

    • @OtakuAltair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Yeah, I only use Mastodon/Twitter to see artwork or what people I’m following are up to.

      They’re not platforms designed for discussion.